Tuesday, December 9, 2008

The Church: shifting history and hoped for future

chapter 2

At a recent Pink House meeting, we read an article about paradigm shifts for the Church. One was encouraging pastors to see their churches as parishes rather than congregations.

A congregation is everyone that shows up in the pews on Sunday: those who actually congregate, or gather. This is who most pastors probably think of when they think about their church. And it makes sense.

A parish is like a district. We have school districts and the kids in a given district go to its schools. We have congressional districts and the people in a given district vote for specific elected officials. The parish come from old French Catholocism mostly. In old times, everyone was expected to go to church and there was maybe one church in each small village. so the priest viewed his whole community as his church. he would go to people's homes to visit them when they were sick, etc.

What would it look like for not just our pastors, but our believing congregation to view our community as our parish? What would it look like for us to care for the people in our community in that way?

In many larger towns and cities across the U.S., many members of the congregation do not live near the church building. For example, most of the congregants at a church in my neighborhood do not live here. Most of them do not fit the socio-economic status of this neighborhood. Most are middle class and white. Some are very wealthy. Why is this and how did it come to be a pattern across the U.S.? "White Flight" is what some people call it. The reason is actually very complex in Fresno. But to simplify the American phenomenon, people of color started moving in to inner-city neighborhoods and white people started moving out to the suburbs. When they left, they did not always change churches. So what you see a lot is the complete opposite of a parish.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

The Church: storming the walls

chapter 1

Here's a verse for meditation:
"And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it." (Matthew 6:18)

Let me add a disclaimer that this is how Phil Skei broke it down. I can take no credit for most of the ideas presented here, only the interpretation and style of presentation.

First item of business: "it." May be referring to "this rock," but more likely is referring to the antecedent "my church." The gates of Hades will not overcome Christ's church.

Next, what are gates? Gates are part of a wall. Back when the bible was written, walls surrounded cities for protection.

Now what does overcome mean? One meaning is defeat. The protective gates of Hades will not defeat Christ's church.

(This next part is my own commentary.) Yes, Christians know that hell is not going to defeat the Church. We know that victory belongs to Christ. We're on the winning team. But how come some of us act like we are the ones who need protecting walls?

Let's back up (this is Phil's brain at work again here). Imagine Hades is a city surrounded by a large wall with imposing gates. Is it on the offensive? Or would that image suggest that we are storming the gates?

Some Christians think or act as though we need to protect the Church. But maybe the Church needs to do some plundering.

Let me do the teacher thing and ask, what are some of the ways that you have seen the Church on defense? Where should it be more on offense?

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Read this article from FIFUL's December 2008 newsletter.